Review



elisa human proprotein convertase 9 pcsk9 quantikine elisa kit  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems elisa human proprotein convertase 9 pcsk9 quantikine elisa kit
    Elisa Human Proprotein Convertase 9 Pcsk9 Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 83 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/pmc13091390-93-23-31?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 83 article reviews
    elisa human proprotein convertase 9 pcsk9 quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Bio-Techne corporation human bmp-4 quantikine elisa kit
    Human Bmp 4 Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/custom-dbp400-42138180?v=Bio-Techne+corporation
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human bmp-4 quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems elisa human proprotein convertase 9 pcsk9 quantikine elisa kit
    Elisa Human Proprotein Convertase 9 Pcsk9 Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/pmc13091390-93-23-31?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elisa human proprotein convertase 9 pcsk9 quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    R&D Systems mouse il 10 elisa kit
    circSMAD4 drives tumor-educated M2-like polarization of macrophages and promotes tumor-cell aggressiveness. (A) Workflow for generating TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs, circSMAD4 knockdown, and downstream functional assays. (B) RT–qPCR analysis of M1-associated markers (MHC-II [HLA-DRA in TC-hMDMs; H2-Ab1 in TC-BMDMs], NOS2, and CD86) and M2-associated markers (CD163, CD206, and ARG1) in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (C) Representative flow-cytometry histograms for HLA-DR, iNOS, CD86, CD163, CD206, and ARG1 in TC-hMDMs. Gating strategy and marker thresholds were defined based on FMO controls (see ). (D) Flow-cytometry quantification of marker-positive cells in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (E) ELISA of <t>IL-10,</t> TGF-β, and iNOS in culture supernatants. (F) CCK-8 assays of A549 and LLC cells. (G) Colony-formation assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. (H) Bioluminescence-based growth readouts of patient-derived LUAD organoids (PDO #1 and PDO #2) after co-culture with TC-hMDMs. (I) Immunoblot analysis of EMT-related proteins (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin) in A549 and LLC cells. (J) Transwell migration and invasion assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
    Mouse Il 10 Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/pmc13050104-63-9-13?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse il 10 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Bio-Techne corporation porcine tnf-alpha quantikine elisa kit
    circSMAD4 drives tumor-educated M2-like polarization of macrophages and promotes tumor-cell aggressiveness. (A) Workflow for generating TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs, circSMAD4 knockdown, and downstream functional assays. (B) RT–qPCR analysis of M1-associated markers (MHC-II [HLA-DRA in TC-hMDMs; H2-Ab1 in TC-BMDMs], NOS2, and CD86) and M2-associated markers (CD163, CD206, and ARG1) in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (C) Representative flow-cytometry histograms for HLA-DR, iNOS, CD86, CD163, CD206, and ARG1 in TC-hMDMs. Gating strategy and marker thresholds were defined based on FMO controls (see ). (D) Flow-cytometry quantification of marker-positive cells in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (E) ELISA of <t>IL-10,</t> TGF-β, and iNOS in culture supernatants. (F) CCK-8 assays of A549 and LLC cells. (G) Colony-formation assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. (H) Bioluminescence-based growth readouts of patient-derived LUAD organoids (PDO #1 and PDO #2) after co-culture with TC-hMDMs. (I) Immunoblot analysis of EMT-related proteins (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin) in A549 and LLC cells. (J) Transwell migration and invasion assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
    Porcine Tnf Alpha Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/custom-pta00-42305994?v=Bio-Techne+corporation
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    porcine tnf-alpha quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Bio-Techne corporation human sost/sclerostin quantikine elisa kit
    circSMAD4 drives tumor-educated M2-like polarization of macrophages and promotes tumor-cell aggressiveness. (A) Workflow for generating TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs, circSMAD4 knockdown, and downstream functional assays. (B) RT–qPCR analysis of M1-associated markers (MHC-II [HLA-DRA in TC-hMDMs; H2-Ab1 in TC-BMDMs], NOS2, and CD86) and M2-associated markers (CD163, CD206, and ARG1) in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (C) Representative flow-cytometry histograms for HLA-DR, iNOS, CD86, CD163, CD206, and ARG1 in TC-hMDMs. Gating strategy and marker thresholds were defined based on FMO controls (see ). (D) Flow-cytometry quantification of marker-positive cells in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (E) ELISA of <t>IL-10,</t> TGF-β, and iNOS in culture supernatants. (F) CCK-8 assays of A549 and LLC cells. (G) Colony-formation assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. (H) Bioluminescence-based growth readouts of patient-derived LUAD organoids (PDO #1 and PDO #2) after co-culture with TC-hMDMs. (I) Immunoblot analysis of EMT-related proteins (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin) in A549 and LLC cells. (J) Transwell migration and invasion assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
    Human Sost/Sclerostin Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/custom-dsst00-10%2E1016%2Fj%2Ejot%2E2026%2E101117?v=Bio-Techne+corporation
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human sost/sclerostin quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    R&D Systems human ifnγ
    <t>Vectorized</t> <t>IFNβ</t> drives durable signaling and complete tumor regression in human glioblastoma models in vivo (A) Sustained hIFNβ secretion in human GBM6 cells treated with AAV9-hIFNβ (red, MOI = 4E5 vg/cell) or recombinant hIFNβ cytokine (r-hIFNβ, purple, 47 IU/mL, equivalent to 114 pg/mL), measured by ELISA at indicated time points. 50% media washouts every 5 h for the first 20 h in the r-hIFNβ condition mimic in vivo cytokine clearance (half-life = 4–5 h). Full media exchanges were performed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-treatment. (B) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, p -Adj<0.01) in GBM6 cells 24–96 h post-treatment with AAV9-hIFNβ or r-hIFNβ vs. media controls. (C) Enrichment scores for type I <t>IFN</t> and TNFα response pathways across treatments and time points. (D) Heatmap of the top 10 IFN and TNFα response genes (Log2FC vs. media controls) in GBM6 cells treated as in (A). (E) Schematic of orthotopic PDX (SF11411) and cell line-derived xenograft ([CDX], GBM6-FLuc) studies in athymic nu/nu mice treated intratumorally with saline, AAV9-GFP, or AAV9-hIFNβ via CED. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). p < 0.04 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G) Longitudinal BLI of GBM6-FLuc tumor growth in CDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗ p < 0.04 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 22. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G′) Representative BLI images from each treatment group 11 days post-treatment. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CDX mice. p < 0.001 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX by BLI flux (photons/second) at day 27. Tumor free = BLI flux <2.5 × 10 5 p/s, tumor reduction = ≥30% decrease from assignment on day 9, no change = between 30% decrease and 20% increase from assignment on day 9, tumor growth = ≥20% increase from assignment on day 9, death = mice that died before day 27. (J) Dose-response analysis of AAV9-hIFNβ efficacy in CDX mice. AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ hi (2E11 vg/brain) = solid red, and AAV9-hIFNβ lo (1E11 vg/brain) = dashed red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗∗ p < 0.02 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 20. n = 45 (15 per treatment arm). For data interpretation, tumor burden threshold = 2.5 × 10 5 . (J′) Representative BLI images of tumors 11 days post-treatment. (K) Kaplan-Meier survival curves from (J). p < 0.002 (AAV9-hIFNβ hi), p < 0.005 (AAV9-hIFNβ lo) by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test compared to AAV9-GFP. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX mice at day 27 by BLI flux as in (I).
    Human Ifnγ, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/pmc13091051-256-36-38?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human ifnγ - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Bio-Techne corporation human/mouse/rat activin a quantikine elisa kit
    <t>Vectorized</t> <t>IFNβ</t> drives durable signaling and complete tumor regression in human glioblastoma models in vivo (A) Sustained hIFNβ secretion in human GBM6 cells treated with AAV9-hIFNβ (red, MOI = 4E5 vg/cell) or recombinant hIFNβ cytokine (r-hIFNβ, purple, 47 IU/mL, equivalent to 114 pg/mL), measured by ELISA at indicated time points. 50% media washouts every 5 h for the first 20 h in the r-hIFNβ condition mimic in vivo cytokine clearance (half-life = 4–5 h). Full media exchanges were performed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-treatment. (B) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, p -Adj<0.01) in GBM6 cells 24–96 h post-treatment with AAV9-hIFNβ or r-hIFNβ vs. media controls. (C) Enrichment scores for type I <t>IFN</t> and TNFα response pathways across treatments and time points. (D) Heatmap of the top 10 IFN and TNFα response genes (Log2FC vs. media controls) in GBM6 cells treated as in (A). (E) Schematic of orthotopic PDX (SF11411) and cell line-derived xenograft ([CDX], GBM6-FLuc) studies in athymic nu/nu mice treated intratumorally with saline, AAV9-GFP, or AAV9-hIFNβ via CED. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). p < 0.04 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G) Longitudinal BLI of GBM6-FLuc tumor growth in CDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗ p < 0.04 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 22. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G′) Representative BLI images from each treatment group 11 days post-treatment. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CDX mice. p < 0.001 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX by BLI flux (photons/second) at day 27. Tumor free = BLI flux <2.5 × 10 5 p/s, tumor reduction = ≥30% decrease from assignment on day 9, no change = between 30% decrease and 20% increase from assignment on day 9, tumor growth = ≥20% increase from assignment on day 9, death = mice that died before day 27. (J) Dose-response analysis of AAV9-hIFNβ efficacy in CDX mice. AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ hi (2E11 vg/brain) = solid red, and AAV9-hIFNβ lo (1E11 vg/brain) = dashed red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗∗ p < 0.02 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 20. n = 45 (15 per treatment arm). For data interpretation, tumor burden threshold = 2.5 × 10 5 . (J′) Representative BLI images of tumors 11 days post-treatment. (K) Kaplan-Meier survival curves from (J). p < 0.002 (AAV9-hIFNβ hi), p < 0.005 (AAV9-hIFNβ lo) by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test compared to AAV9-GFP. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX mice at day 27 by BLI flux as in (I).
    Human/Mouse/Rat Activin A Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/custom-dac00b-10%2E64898%2F2026%2E06%2E08%2E26355189?v=Bio-Techne+corporation
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human/mouse/rat activin a quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bio-Techne corporation human serpin e1/pai-1 quantikine elisa kit
    <t>Vectorized</t> <t>IFNβ</t> drives durable signaling and complete tumor regression in human glioblastoma models in vivo (A) Sustained hIFNβ secretion in human GBM6 cells treated with AAV9-hIFNβ (red, MOI = 4E5 vg/cell) or recombinant hIFNβ cytokine (r-hIFNβ, purple, 47 IU/mL, equivalent to 114 pg/mL), measured by ELISA at indicated time points. 50% media washouts every 5 h for the first 20 h in the r-hIFNβ condition mimic in vivo cytokine clearance (half-life = 4–5 h). Full media exchanges were performed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-treatment. (B) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, p -Adj<0.01) in GBM6 cells 24–96 h post-treatment with AAV9-hIFNβ or r-hIFNβ vs. media controls. (C) Enrichment scores for type I <t>IFN</t> and TNFα response pathways across treatments and time points. (D) Heatmap of the top 10 IFN and TNFα response genes (Log2FC vs. media controls) in GBM6 cells treated as in (A). (E) Schematic of orthotopic PDX (SF11411) and cell line-derived xenograft ([CDX], GBM6-FLuc) studies in athymic nu/nu mice treated intratumorally with saline, AAV9-GFP, or AAV9-hIFNβ via CED. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). p < 0.04 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G) Longitudinal BLI of GBM6-FLuc tumor growth in CDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗ p < 0.04 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 22. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G′) Representative BLI images from each treatment group 11 days post-treatment. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CDX mice. p < 0.001 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX by BLI flux (photons/second) at day 27. Tumor free = BLI flux <2.5 × 10 5 p/s, tumor reduction = ≥30% decrease from assignment on day 9, no change = between 30% decrease and 20% increase from assignment on day 9, tumor growth = ≥20% increase from assignment on day 9, death = mice that died before day 27. (J) Dose-response analysis of AAV9-hIFNβ efficacy in CDX mice. AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ hi (2E11 vg/brain) = solid red, and AAV9-hIFNβ lo (1E11 vg/brain) = dashed red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗∗ p < 0.02 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 20. n = 45 (15 per treatment arm). For data interpretation, tumor burden threshold = 2.5 × 10 5 . (J′) Representative BLI images of tumors 11 days post-treatment. (K) Kaplan-Meier survival curves from (J). p < 0.002 (AAV9-hIFNβ hi), p < 0.005 (AAV9-hIFNβ lo) by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test compared to AAV9-GFP. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX mice at day 27 by BLI flux as in (I).
    Human Serpin E1/Pai 1 Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/custom-dse100-10%2E64898%2F2026%2E06%2E08%2E26355189?v=Bio-Techne+corporation
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human serpin e1/pai-1 quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    R&D Systems il 13
    Effects of CuONPs on allergic inflammation and oxidative stress in OVA-induced asthmatic mice. (A) Airway hyperresponsiveness assessed as total respiratory system resistance in response to methacholine challenge (10, 20, and 40 mg/mL). (B–F) Total and differential inflammatory cell counts in BALF. (G–L) IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, <t>and</t> <t>IL-13</t> levels in BALF, measured by ELISA. (M and N) Total IgE and OVA specific IgE levels in serum. (O and P) MDA levels and SOD activity in lung tissue. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 6 mice/group). ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus NC group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 versus OVA group.
    Il 13, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/pmc13122667-77-39-40?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    il 13 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems bmp 2
    SCS modulates mesenchymal stem cell lineage bias via activation of the IGF-1/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. ( A ) Quantitative analysis of osteocyte morphology in the trabecular bone matrix of the bone marrow at week 6 after MPS treatment with or without SCS, in the presence of various neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and antagonistic proteins. ( B ) ELISA analysis of IGF-1 <t>and</t> <t>BMP-2</t> levels in the femoral bone marrow and peripheral serum at day 7 following SCS treatment under MPS conditions. ( C and D ) Western blot analysis of phospho-PI3K, phospho-Akt, and phospho-mTOR (C), as well as phospho-Smad1/5/8, phospho-ERK, and phospho-p38 (D), in CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 − LepR + MSCs after 15-min stimulation with conditioned medium (CM) derived from bone marrow fluid at day 7 following SCS treatment. ( E – G ) Representative flow cytometry plots (E, F) and quantitative analysis (G) of CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 − adipocyte progenitor cells (APCs), CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 + MSCs (E), and CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 − PDGFRα + (Pα + ) osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs) (F) from femoral bone marrow at day 14 post-MPS induction with or without combined treatment using SCS and IGF-1 NAb or Noggin. ( H and I ) Representative SA-β-Gal staining images (green) of the femur (H), and corresponding quantification (I), at week 4 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 NAb or DMH1. Insets show magnified views of bone marrow (BM) and trabecular bone matrix (TBM) regions. (Scale bars, 100 μm and 25 μm) ( J ) qPCR analysis of 12 senescence-associated markers in ex vivo femoral bone tissues at week 4 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 NAb or DMH1. ( K ) Representative Oil Red O staining images of CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 − LepR + MSCs sorted from femurs at day 7 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with LY294002 or LDN-193189, after in vitro adipogenic induction. (Scale bars, 50 μm and 25 μm) ( L and M ) γ-H2A.X and telomere-associated DNA damage foci (TAFs) co-localization analysis (L), and corresponding quantification (M), in CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 + arteriolar ECs sorted from femurs at day 28 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with rapamycin or LDN-193189, using immuno-FISH staining. (Scale bars, 7 μm and 1 μm) ( N and O ) Sequential fluorescent labeling using calcein (N) and quantification of mineral apposition rate (O) in femurs treated with SCS and MPS for 4 weeks, with or without LY294002 and/or GW9662. (Scale bars, 50 μm) ( P ) ELISA analysis of five senescence-associated cytokines in femoral bone marrow at day 28 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with rapamycin and/or T0070907. ( Q and R ) Representative t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plots (Q) from flow cytometric analysis of CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 − APCs, CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 + MSCs, CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 − Pα + OPCs, CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 + arteriolar ECs, and CD45 − Ter119 − Emcn + sinusoidal ECs at day 14 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 and/or rosiglitazone, and quantitative analysis of APCs (R) ( S ) Heatmap showing the fluorescent intensity distribution of Lamin-B1 expression across five cellular subpopulations as identified in the t-SNE clustering plot. ∗ P < 0.05 vs. IgG (empty lacunae); # P < 0.05 vs. IgG (filled lacunae). ∗ P < 0.05 vs. SCS; # P < 0.05 vs. SCS + IGF-1 NAb. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t -test ( B ), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test ( A, G, I, J, O, P and R ).
    Bmp 2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/quantikine+elisa/pmc12859453-606-36-37?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bmp 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    circSMAD4 drives tumor-educated M2-like polarization of macrophages and promotes tumor-cell aggressiveness. (A) Workflow for generating TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs, circSMAD4 knockdown, and downstream functional assays. (B) RT–qPCR analysis of M1-associated markers (MHC-II [HLA-DRA in TC-hMDMs; H2-Ab1 in TC-BMDMs], NOS2, and CD86) and M2-associated markers (CD163, CD206, and ARG1) in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (C) Representative flow-cytometry histograms for HLA-DR, iNOS, CD86, CD163, CD206, and ARG1 in TC-hMDMs. Gating strategy and marker thresholds were defined based on FMO controls (see ). (D) Flow-cytometry quantification of marker-positive cells in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (E) ELISA of IL-10, TGF-β, and iNOS in culture supernatants. (F) CCK-8 assays of A549 and LLC cells. (G) Colony-formation assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. (H) Bioluminescence-based growth readouts of patient-derived LUAD organoids (PDO #1 and PDO #2) after co-culture with TC-hMDMs. (I) Immunoblot analysis of EMT-related proteins (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin) in A549 and LLC cells. (J) Transwell migration and invasion assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

    Journal: Non-coding RNA Research

    Article Title: CircSMAD4 shapes matrix-remodeling TAMs in lung adenocarcinoma

    doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2026.03.003

    Figure Lengend Snippet: circSMAD4 drives tumor-educated M2-like polarization of macrophages and promotes tumor-cell aggressiveness. (A) Workflow for generating TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs, circSMAD4 knockdown, and downstream functional assays. (B) RT–qPCR analysis of M1-associated markers (MHC-II [HLA-DRA in TC-hMDMs; H2-Ab1 in TC-BMDMs], NOS2, and CD86) and M2-associated markers (CD163, CD206, and ARG1) in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (C) Representative flow-cytometry histograms for HLA-DR, iNOS, CD86, CD163, CD206, and ARG1 in TC-hMDMs. Gating strategy and marker thresholds were defined based on FMO controls (see ). (D) Flow-cytometry quantification of marker-positive cells in TC-hMDMs and TC-BMDMs. (E) ELISA of IL-10, TGF-β, and iNOS in culture supernatants. (F) CCK-8 assays of A549 and LLC cells. (G) Colony-formation assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. (H) Bioluminescence-based growth readouts of patient-derived LUAD organoids (PDO #1 and PDO #2) after co-culture with TC-hMDMs. (I) Immunoblot analysis of EMT-related proteins (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin) in A549 and LLC cells. (J) Transwell migration and invasion assays of A549 and LLC cells with quantification. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: For mouse experiments, mouse IL-10 was measured using the Mouse IL-10 ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, Cat# M1000B), and mouse TGF-β1 was measured using the Mouse TGF beta-1 ELISA Kit (Invitrogen, Cat# BMS608-4), following the manufacturers’ instructions.

    Techniques: Knockdown, Functional Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Flow Cytometry, Marker, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, CCK-8 Assay, Derivative Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Western Blot, Migration

    Vectorized IFNβ drives durable signaling and complete tumor regression in human glioblastoma models in vivo (A) Sustained hIFNβ secretion in human GBM6 cells treated with AAV9-hIFNβ (red, MOI = 4E5 vg/cell) or recombinant hIFNβ cytokine (r-hIFNβ, purple, 47 IU/mL, equivalent to 114 pg/mL), measured by ELISA at indicated time points. 50% media washouts every 5 h for the first 20 h in the r-hIFNβ condition mimic in vivo cytokine clearance (half-life = 4–5 h). Full media exchanges were performed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-treatment. (B) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, p -Adj<0.01) in GBM6 cells 24–96 h post-treatment with AAV9-hIFNβ or r-hIFNβ vs. media controls. (C) Enrichment scores for type I IFN and TNFα response pathways across treatments and time points. (D) Heatmap of the top 10 IFN and TNFα response genes (Log2FC vs. media controls) in GBM6 cells treated as in (A). (E) Schematic of orthotopic PDX (SF11411) and cell line-derived xenograft ([CDX], GBM6-FLuc) studies in athymic nu/nu mice treated intratumorally with saline, AAV9-GFP, or AAV9-hIFNβ via CED. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). p < 0.04 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G) Longitudinal BLI of GBM6-FLuc tumor growth in CDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗ p < 0.04 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 22. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G′) Representative BLI images from each treatment group 11 days post-treatment. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CDX mice. p < 0.001 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX by BLI flux (photons/second) at day 27. Tumor free = BLI flux <2.5 × 10 5 p/s, tumor reduction = ≥30% decrease from assignment on day 9, no change = between 30% decrease and 20% increase from assignment on day 9, tumor growth = ≥20% increase from assignment on day 9, death = mice that died before day 27. (J) Dose-response analysis of AAV9-hIFNβ efficacy in CDX mice. AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ hi (2E11 vg/brain) = solid red, and AAV9-hIFNβ lo (1E11 vg/brain) = dashed red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗∗ p < 0.02 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 20. n = 45 (15 per treatment arm). For data interpretation, tumor burden threshold = 2.5 × 10 5 . (J′) Representative BLI images of tumors 11 days post-treatment. (K) Kaplan-Meier survival curves from (J). p < 0.002 (AAV9-hIFNβ hi), p < 0.005 (AAV9-hIFNβ lo) by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test compared to AAV9-GFP. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX mice at day 27 by BLI flux as in (I).

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: AAV immuno-gene therapy platform delivering vectorized cytokines defines a new modality for high-grade glioma treatment

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2026.201183

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Vectorized IFNβ drives durable signaling and complete tumor regression in human glioblastoma models in vivo (A) Sustained hIFNβ secretion in human GBM6 cells treated with AAV9-hIFNβ (red, MOI = 4E5 vg/cell) or recombinant hIFNβ cytokine (r-hIFNβ, purple, 47 IU/mL, equivalent to 114 pg/mL), measured by ELISA at indicated time points. 50% media washouts every 5 h for the first 20 h in the r-hIFNβ condition mimic in vivo cytokine clearance (half-life = 4–5 h). Full media exchanges were performed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-treatment. (B) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, p -Adj<0.01) in GBM6 cells 24–96 h post-treatment with AAV9-hIFNβ or r-hIFNβ vs. media controls. (C) Enrichment scores for type I IFN and TNFα response pathways across treatments and time points. (D) Heatmap of the top 10 IFN and TNFα response genes (Log2FC vs. media controls) in GBM6 cells treated as in (A). (E) Schematic of orthotopic PDX (SF11411) and cell line-derived xenograft ([CDX], GBM6-FLuc) studies in athymic nu/nu mice treated intratumorally with saline, AAV9-GFP, or AAV9-hIFNβ via CED. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). p < 0.04 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G) Longitudinal BLI of GBM6-FLuc tumor growth in CDX mice treated as in (E). Saline = black, AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ (2E11 vg/brain) = red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗ p < 0.04 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 22. n = 30 (10 per treatment arm). (G′) Representative BLI images from each treatment group 11 days post-treatment. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CDX mice. p < 0.001 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX by BLI flux (photons/second) at day 27. Tumor free = BLI flux <2.5 × 10 5 p/s, tumor reduction = ≥30% decrease from assignment on day 9, no change = between 30% decrease and 20% increase from assignment on day 9, tumor growth = ≥20% increase from assignment on day 9, death = mice that died before day 27. (J) Dose-response analysis of AAV9-hIFNβ efficacy in CDX mice. AAV9-GFP (2E11 vg/brain) = blue, AAV9-hIFNβ hi (2E11 vg/brain) = solid red, and AAV9-hIFNβ lo (1E11 vg/brain) = dashed red. Thin lines = individual mice, thick lines = geometric mean. Vertical dashed line = day of treatment (day 9). ∗∗ p < 0.02 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons correction on day 20. n = 45 (15 per treatment arm). For data interpretation, tumor burden threshold = 2.5 × 10 5 . (J′) Representative BLI images of tumors 11 days post-treatment. (K) Kaplan-Meier survival curves from (J). p < 0.002 (AAV9-hIFNβ hi), p < 0.005 (AAV9-hIFNβ lo) by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test compared to AAV9-GFP. (I) Distribution of treatment responses in CDX mice at day 27 by BLI flux as in (I).

    Article Snippet: 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after treatment, cell supernatants were collected and IFN variant levels were measured using IFN ELISA kits following the manufacturer’s instructions (human IFNα [PBL Cat# 41135-1], human IFNβ [PBL Cat#41410], and human IFNγ [R&D Systems Cat#: DIF50C]).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Recombinant, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Derivative Assay, Saline

    Spatial transcriptomics reveals rapid, localized transcriptional remodeling of the tumor microenvironment following vectorized hIFNβ treatment (A) Coronal brain sections from representative human GBM6-FLuc CDX mice collected pre-treatment (0 h, n = 1) or 48 h ( n = 1) after intratumoral AAV9-hIFNβ infusion (2E11 vg/brain), stained with H&E (left) and subjected to Visium Spatial Gene Expression profiling (right). Annotated clusters were assigned based on anatomical localization and marker gene expression. Dashed lines denote tumor borders. Scale bars, 1 mm. (B) Top 10 marker genes for each spatially resolved cluster identified across 0 h and 48 h datasets. Values are shown as log-normalized expression centered at 0 (Seurat “scale.data”). (C) Spatial expression of canonical human GBM tumor markers ( CD44 , VIM , TOP2A , and NOTCH1 ) delineating tumor and peri-tumor regions before (0 h) (top) and after (bottom) (48 h) AAV9-hIFNβ treatment. (D) Expression maps of the human IFNβ payload and hallmark IFN-response genes ( CXCL10 , IFIT1 , and IFIT2 ), demonstrating tumor-restricted transgene expression and induction of an IFN-specific transcriptional program within 48 h. (E) Spatial expression of host mouse immune-response genes ( Gfap , Ifitm3 , and Irf7 ) showing localized activation of astroglial and innate immune pathways proximal to the tumor. (F) Integrated datasets (0 and 48 h) visualized using canonical correlation analysis (CCA), showing distinct clustering of tumor and peri-tumor regions (left) and enrichment of IFN-response gene module expression (right). (G) Volcano plot depicting differential gene expression between 0- and 48-h tumor clusters. Red, IFN-response genes; gray, other significantly upregulated genes ( p -Adj <0.01); blue, non-significant. (H) Top enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms among upregulated genes in 48-h tumor cells, highlighting interferon and inflammatory response pathways (∗∗ p -Adj <0.01; ∗ p -Adj <0.05).

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: AAV immuno-gene therapy platform delivering vectorized cytokines defines a new modality for high-grade glioma treatment

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2026.201183

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Spatial transcriptomics reveals rapid, localized transcriptional remodeling of the tumor microenvironment following vectorized hIFNβ treatment (A) Coronal brain sections from representative human GBM6-FLuc CDX mice collected pre-treatment (0 h, n = 1) or 48 h ( n = 1) after intratumoral AAV9-hIFNβ infusion (2E11 vg/brain), stained with H&E (left) and subjected to Visium Spatial Gene Expression profiling (right). Annotated clusters were assigned based on anatomical localization and marker gene expression. Dashed lines denote tumor borders. Scale bars, 1 mm. (B) Top 10 marker genes for each spatially resolved cluster identified across 0 h and 48 h datasets. Values are shown as log-normalized expression centered at 0 (Seurat “scale.data”). (C) Spatial expression of canonical human GBM tumor markers ( CD44 , VIM , TOP2A , and NOTCH1 ) delineating tumor and peri-tumor regions before (0 h) (top) and after (bottom) (48 h) AAV9-hIFNβ treatment. (D) Expression maps of the human IFNβ payload and hallmark IFN-response genes ( CXCL10 , IFIT1 , and IFIT2 ), demonstrating tumor-restricted transgene expression and induction of an IFN-specific transcriptional program within 48 h. (E) Spatial expression of host mouse immune-response genes ( Gfap , Ifitm3 , and Irf7 ) showing localized activation of astroglial and innate immune pathways proximal to the tumor. (F) Integrated datasets (0 and 48 h) visualized using canonical correlation analysis (CCA), showing distinct clustering of tumor and peri-tumor regions (left) and enrichment of IFN-response gene module expression (right). (G) Volcano plot depicting differential gene expression between 0- and 48-h tumor clusters. Red, IFN-response genes; gray, other significantly upregulated genes ( p -Adj <0.01); blue, non-significant. (H) Top enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms among upregulated genes in 48-h tumor cells, highlighting interferon and inflammatory response pathways (∗∗ p -Adj <0.01; ∗ p -Adj <0.05).

    Article Snippet: 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after treatment, cell supernatants were collected and IFN variant levels were measured using IFN ELISA kits following the manufacturer’s instructions (human IFNα [PBL Cat# 41135-1], human IFNβ [PBL Cat#41410], and human IFNγ [R&D Systems Cat#: DIF50C]).

    Techniques: Spatial Transcriptomics, Staining, Gene Expression, Marker, Expressing, Activation Assay

    Effects of CuONPs on allergic inflammation and oxidative stress in OVA-induced asthmatic mice. (A) Airway hyperresponsiveness assessed as total respiratory system resistance in response to methacholine challenge (10, 20, and 40 mg/mL). (B–F) Total and differential inflammatory cell counts in BALF. (G–L) IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 levels in BALF, measured by ELISA. (M and N) Total IgE and OVA specific IgE levels in serum. (O and P) MDA levels and SOD activity in lung tissue. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 6 mice/group). ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus NC group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 versus OVA group.

    Journal: Redox Biology

    Article Title: Nrf2 pathway mediates copper oxide nanoparticle-induced exacerbation of allergic asthma

    doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104180

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of CuONPs on allergic inflammation and oxidative stress in OVA-induced asthmatic mice. (A) Airway hyperresponsiveness assessed as total respiratory system resistance in response to methacholine challenge (10, 20, and 40 mg/mL). (B–F) Total and differential inflammatory cell counts in BALF. (G–L) IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 levels in BALF, measured by ELISA. (M and N) Total IgE and OVA specific IgE levels in serum. (O and P) MDA levels and SOD activity in lung tissue. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 6 mice/group). ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus NC group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 versus OVA group.

    Article Snippet: BALF was centrifuged at 300× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was stored for cytokine analysis using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits to quantify IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Cat. No. MLB00C, M6000B, MTA00B, M4000B, M5000, and M1300CB, respectively).

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Activity Assay

    Effects of Nrf2 overexpression on allergic inflammation and oxidative stress in CuONP-exposed asthmatic mice. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of lung tissue from mice administered PBS or AAV2/8-GFP via intratracheal instillation. (B) Airway hyperresponsiveness assessed as total respiratory system resistance in response to methacholine challenge (10, 20, and 40 mg/mL). (C–G) Total and differential inflammatory cell counts in BALF. (H–M) IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 levels in BALF, measured by ELISA. (N and O) Total IgE and OVA specific IgE levels in serum. (P and Q) MDA levels and SOD activity in lung tissue. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3 mice/group for panels A; n = 6 mice/group for panels B–Q). In panel B, ## p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between GFP-NC and GFP-OVA, and ∗∗ p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between GFP-OVA + CuONPs and Nrf2-OVA + CuONPs. For panels C–Q, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 indicate significant differences between AAV-GFP and AAV-Nrf2 within each condition.

    Journal: Redox Biology

    Article Title: Nrf2 pathway mediates copper oxide nanoparticle-induced exacerbation of allergic asthma

    doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104180

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of Nrf2 overexpression on allergic inflammation and oxidative stress in CuONP-exposed asthmatic mice. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of lung tissue from mice administered PBS or AAV2/8-GFP via intratracheal instillation. (B) Airway hyperresponsiveness assessed as total respiratory system resistance in response to methacholine challenge (10, 20, and 40 mg/mL). (C–G) Total and differential inflammatory cell counts in BALF. (H–M) IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 levels in BALF, measured by ELISA. (N and O) Total IgE and OVA specific IgE levels in serum. (P and Q) MDA levels and SOD activity in lung tissue. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3 mice/group for panels A; n = 6 mice/group for panels B–Q). In panel B, ## p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between GFP-NC and GFP-OVA, and ∗∗ p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between GFP-OVA + CuONPs and Nrf2-OVA + CuONPs. For panels C–Q, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 indicate significant differences between AAV-GFP and AAV-Nrf2 within each condition.

    Article Snippet: BALF was centrifuged at 300× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was stored for cytokine analysis using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits to quantify IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Cat. No. MLB00C, M6000B, MTA00B, M4000B, M5000, and M1300CB, respectively).

    Techniques: Over Expression, Immunofluorescence, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Activity Assay

    SCS modulates mesenchymal stem cell lineage bias via activation of the IGF-1/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. ( A ) Quantitative analysis of osteocyte morphology in the trabecular bone matrix of the bone marrow at week 6 after MPS treatment with or without SCS, in the presence of various neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and antagonistic proteins. ( B ) ELISA analysis of IGF-1 and BMP-2 levels in the femoral bone marrow and peripheral serum at day 7 following SCS treatment under MPS conditions. ( C and D ) Western blot analysis of phospho-PI3K, phospho-Akt, and phospho-mTOR (C), as well as phospho-Smad1/5/8, phospho-ERK, and phospho-p38 (D), in CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 − LepR + MSCs after 15-min stimulation with conditioned medium (CM) derived from bone marrow fluid at day 7 following SCS treatment. ( E – G ) Representative flow cytometry plots (E, F) and quantitative analysis (G) of CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 − adipocyte progenitor cells (APCs), CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 + MSCs (E), and CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 − PDGFRα + (Pα + ) osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs) (F) from femoral bone marrow at day 14 post-MPS induction with or without combined treatment using SCS and IGF-1 NAb or Noggin. ( H and I ) Representative SA-β-Gal staining images (green) of the femur (H), and corresponding quantification (I), at week 4 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 NAb or DMH1. Insets show magnified views of bone marrow (BM) and trabecular bone matrix (TBM) regions. (Scale bars, 100 μm and 25 μm) ( J ) qPCR analysis of 12 senescence-associated markers in ex vivo femoral bone tissues at week 4 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 NAb or DMH1. ( K ) Representative Oil Red O staining images of CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 − LepR + MSCs sorted from femurs at day 7 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with LY294002 or LDN-193189, after in vitro adipogenic induction. (Scale bars, 50 μm and 25 μm) ( L and M ) γ-H2A.X and telomere-associated DNA damage foci (TAFs) co-localization analysis (L), and corresponding quantification (M), in CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 + arteriolar ECs sorted from femurs at day 28 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with rapamycin or LDN-193189, using immuno-FISH staining. (Scale bars, 7 μm and 1 μm) ( N and O ) Sequential fluorescent labeling using calcein (N) and quantification of mineral apposition rate (O) in femurs treated with SCS and MPS for 4 weeks, with or without LY294002 and/or GW9662. (Scale bars, 50 μm) ( P ) ELISA analysis of five senescence-associated cytokines in femoral bone marrow at day 28 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with rapamycin and/or T0070907. ( Q and R ) Representative t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plots (Q) from flow cytometric analysis of CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 − APCs, CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 + MSCs, CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 − Pα + OPCs, CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 + arteriolar ECs, and CD45 − Ter119 − Emcn + sinusoidal ECs at day 14 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 and/or rosiglitazone, and quantitative analysis of APCs (R) ( S ) Heatmap showing the fluorescent intensity distribution of Lamin-B1 expression across five cellular subpopulations as identified in the t-SNE clustering plot. ∗ P < 0.05 vs. IgG (empty lacunae); # P < 0.05 vs. IgG (filled lacunae). ∗ P < 0.05 vs. SCS; # P < 0.05 vs. SCS + IGF-1 NAb. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t -test ( B ), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test ( A, G, I, J, O, P and R ).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Sulfated polysaccharide prevents senescent adipocyte-driven osteonecrosis by stem cell fate reprogramming

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.11.039

    Figure Lengend Snippet: SCS modulates mesenchymal stem cell lineage bias via activation of the IGF-1/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. ( A ) Quantitative analysis of osteocyte morphology in the trabecular bone matrix of the bone marrow at week 6 after MPS treatment with or without SCS, in the presence of various neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and antagonistic proteins. ( B ) ELISA analysis of IGF-1 and BMP-2 levels in the femoral bone marrow and peripheral serum at day 7 following SCS treatment under MPS conditions. ( C and D ) Western blot analysis of phospho-PI3K, phospho-Akt, and phospho-mTOR (C), as well as phospho-Smad1/5/8, phospho-ERK, and phospho-p38 (D), in CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 − LepR + MSCs after 15-min stimulation with conditioned medium (CM) derived from bone marrow fluid at day 7 following SCS treatment. ( E – G ) Representative flow cytometry plots (E, F) and quantitative analysis (G) of CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 − adipocyte progenitor cells (APCs), CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 + MSCs (E), and CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 − PDGFRα + (Pα + ) osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs) (F) from femoral bone marrow at day 14 post-MPS induction with or without combined treatment using SCS and IGF-1 NAb or Noggin. ( H and I ) Representative SA-β-Gal staining images (green) of the femur (H), and corresponding quantification (I), at week 4 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 NAb or DMH1. Insets show magnified views of bone marrow (BM) and trabecular bone matrix (TBM) regions. (Scale bars, 100 μm and 25 μm) ( J ) qPCR analysis of 12 senescence-associated markers in ex vivo femoral bone tissues at week 4 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 NAb or DMH1. ( K ) Representative Oil Red O staining images of CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 − LepR + MSCs sorted from femurs at day 7 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with LY294002 or LDN-193189, after in vitro adipogenic induction. (Scale bars, 50 μm and 25 μm) ( L and M ) γ-H2A.X and telomere-associated DNA damage foci (TAFs) co-localization analysis (L), and corresponding quantification (M), in CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 + arteriolar ECs sorted from femurs at day 28 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with rapamycin or LDN-193189, using immuno-FISH staining. (Scale bars, 7 μm and 1 μm) ( N and O ) Sequential fluorescent labeling using calcein (N) and quantification of mineral apposition rate (O) in femurs treated with SCS and MPS for 4 weeks, with or without LY294002 and/or GW9662. (Scale bars, 50 μm) ( P ) ELISA analysis of five senescence-associated cytokines in femoral bone marrow at day 28 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with rapamycin and/or T0070907. ( Q and R ) Representative t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plots (Q) from flow cytometric analysis of CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 − APCs, CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 + CD24 + MSCs, CD45 − CD31 − Sca-1 − Pα + OPCs, CD45 − Ter119 − CD31 + arteriolar ECs, and CD45 − Ter119 − Emcn + sinusoidal ECs at day 14 following MPS treatment with SCS in combination with IGF-1 and/or rosiglitazone, and quantitative analysis of APCs (R) ( S ) Heatmap showing the fluorescent intensity distribution of Lamin-B1 expression across five cellular subpopulations as identified in the t-SNE clustering plot. ∗ P < 0.05 vs. IgG (empty lacunae); # P < 0.05 vs. IgG (filled lacunae). ∗ P < 0.05 vs. SCS; # P < 0.05 vs. SCS + IGF-1 NAb. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t -test ( B ), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test ( A, G, I, J, O, P and R ).

    Article Snippet: Furthermore, to explore the molecular mechanisms by which SCS regulates MSCs lineage bias, bone marrow supernatant was collected on day 7 following co-treatment with SCS and MPS, and ELISA assays for IGF-1 (R&D Systems, MG100) and BMP-2 (R&D Systems, DBP200) were performed as described above.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Labeling, Expressing, Two Tailed Test